Companies AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca

Dublin, Dublin, IRL

70,000 Total Employees

Year Founded: 1999

View Website

Similar Companies Hiring

Pfizer

Artificial Intelligence • Healthtech • Machine Learning • Natural Language Processing • Biotech • Pharmaceutical

19 Offices

121990 Employees

AstraZeneca Leadership & Management

Updated on January 06, 2026

This page was generated by Built In using publicly available information and AI-based analysis of common questions about the company. It has not been reviewed or approved by the company.

How are the managers & leadership at AstraZeneca?

Strengths in long‑term strategic clarity, decisive capital commitments, and organizational alignment are accompanied by challenges in middle‑management consistency, cross‑site cohesion, and the operational drag of reorgs and compliance shifts. Together, these dynamics suggest a company with clear top‑level direction and resources where day‑to‑day leadership quality and organizational complexity can materially shape team execution and employee experience.

Positive Themes About AstraZeneca

Strategic Vision & Planning: Senior leaders consistently articulate a science‑led long‑term plan with clear therapeutic priorities and matching capital investments. Leadership stability and visible communication reinforce purpose and momentum across the company.
Decisive Leadership: Management pursues bold growth moves and targeted manufacturing build‑outs that align with the oncology‑led thesis. Public milestones and repeated narratives link long‑range goals to pipeline progress and capacity expansion.
Collaborative & Aligned Leadership: Enterprise tools such as balanced scorecards cascade objectives and tie individual work to corporate priorities. Board oversight and a visible executive team help coordinate strategy and operations across functions and geographies.

Considerations About AstraZeneca

Biased or Inconsistent Leadership: Experiences with direct managers differ by team and site, reflecting uneven people management and communication at the middle layers. Management quality is described as variable, indicating inconsistent day‑to‑day leadership.
Siloed or Fragmented Leadership: Differences between functions and country affiliates, along with cross‑site communication challenges, can yield duplicated efforts and inconsistent execution. Market‑specific leadership shifts further contribute to fragmented experiences.
Poor Execution: Reorganizations and process load can slow decisions and create uncertainty for teams. Compliance‑driven changes in certain markets deliver risk control benefits but have been disruptive to local operations.

NEW

What does AI tell candidates about your employer brand?

Get your free AI reputation report today.

See AI Report

The insights on this page are generated by submitting structured prompts to some of the most popular large language models (“LLMs”) and summarizing recurring themes from the responses. Because the insights are generated using AI, they may contain errors. The insights do not necessarily reflect internal data, employee interviews, or verified company information. They may be influenced by incomplete, outdated, or inaccurate data, and may vary across LLM providers. These insights are intended for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as a factual or definitive assessment of a company's reputation. Built In makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of this information, and disclaims any liability for any actions taken based on this information. If you are a representative of this company, and would like this page to be removed, you may contact us via this form.

Is This Your Company? Claim Profile